I expect greatness after a great Berlinale

drrt

Dodes’kaden

I think I remember Gorp recommending this film, but typically I take note of everything Gorp recommends to me (see the my watchlists) but I can’t find this one… does this mean I lost other recommendations too? Ahhhh.

Recently, during the Berlinale I have named Ozu, Mizoguchi and Naruse as the big three of Japanese cinema. Shii and Pixelmatsch were surprised that I didn’t count Kurosawa, but the truth is – he really doesn’t feel Japanese to me. I don’t even consider this movie particularly Japanese, because using the contemporary slums as a topic feels so utterly un-Japanese? Even so, after being rather disappointed by “Ugetsu Monogatari” (why are people so into it?) I can say for sure that I prefer Kurosawa over Mizoguchi. By far.

In typical Loris style, I’d say that Dodes’kaden is the kind of film that needs to sink in. However, the impressions were also so deep that I wanted to write about them instantly. First of all, I think that the movie is a masterpiece and I can’t understand why it was a critical and commercial failure. (OK, I can easily understand why it was a commercial failure.) It’s beautiful and sad and human and just so true. It took about 20 minutes to get into the film (the first 10 are spent almost without plot anyways), but then I started loving it. Dodes’kaden made me laugh and cry, I wanted to look away in anger and heartbreak. Oh my goodness, this movie is so heartbreakingly sad, it’s too difficult to take at times.

The film does not look beautiful, but it’s a Kurosawa and outward beauty is not an important point in his films. Kurosawa is all about story-telling and drama and less about visual beauty like the aforementioned big three. Nevertheless, it’s not like Kurosawa put no thoughts into the visuals, he actually uses the colors with a clear agenda in mind. Just like Godard, he seems to have a preference for bright base colors – blue, yellow and red. As you can see in the aptly chosen screenshot in this Criterion essay, Kurosawa made the women’s buckets call back to their clothes, which also calls back to their husband’s word uniforms, yellow and red respectively. Considering that their storyline is about switching husbands, this choice of color adds to its comic effect.

It is rare that an omnibus film with so many characters touches me on such a deep level because you don’t spend as much time with each character. (Woody Allen and Robert Altman, I am looking at you, you should have learned from Kurosawa!) “Dodes’kaden” is an unusual little gem, an emotional rollercaster that I am afraid to get onto again.

Berlinale 2014, Day 10 (La belle et a bete)

My original plan was to see this film and Cocteau’s “La belle et la bête” in direct comparison, both of which were shown at the Berlinale. I had scheduled for Cocteau’s version too but then ended up not seeing it. I don’t really feel as motivated to watch easily available old films at the Berlinale, especially when it’s not a silent film with live piano. But since I already had tickets for the newer film, I couldn’t let it go to waste.

drrt

La belle et la bête
France/Germany 2014, Christophe Gans, 112′

Belle’s father is an impoverished merchant with six children to take care of and but only one responsible child, Belle herself. The rest are troublemakers or comic relief. With some variations to the classical Beauty and the Beast tale, Belle starts living at the castle of the Beast after her father takes a rose from his garden, and slowly comes to love the Beast, ultimately saving him.
Death count: As many as there were in the group of thugs, plus a forest spirit.

I have never really understood why people are so into Léa Seydoux. I think she is pretty but she’s just not my type. Other than that, she also doesn’t strike me as a great actress and kind of reminds me of Mia Wasikowska in that respect. That is unfortunate, I think the film would have been quite different with, say, Virginie Ledoyen as the main character.

The film’s biggest appeal is definitely its looks. The scenes in and around the castle are of almost unparalleled beauty, with a clear nod to the Lord of the Rings franchise. Personally, I prefer its fairytale style over the Lord of the Rings, and that means something. It’s just so damn pretty. Belle’s dresses are similarly awesome and prettier than anything Tim Burton has ever designed. The story is fine (apart from the part with the princess) and can be described as lovely most of the time. The biggest problem probably lies with the source material itself – it’s all about Stockholm Syndrome after all. I felt a little uncomfortable when I realized that the women in the story more or less sell their body to men in order to get what they want (“I will dance with you if you let me see my family”, “If you give me a son, I will do as you ask and stop hunting”), which not only means that they are engaging in some sort of prostitution but that in this story, women are ultimately powerless apart from their beauty. That makes this film a little questionable to show to little children (but so does Tim Burton’s “Alice in Wonderland” for its glory to colonization ending).

In the end, I had a lot of fun watching the film and reveled in the pretty visuals and fun action effects. I just wouldn’t recommend the film, and I think that the money spent on the film would have been better somewhere else. Film-makers especially in French cinema need to stop rehashing old, out-dated stories over and over again.

Berlinale 2014, Day 10 (Praia do futuro)

It’s possible to buy all the tickets for the very last day of the Berlinale at a special price (6 euros) at the first day of ticket sales. As a result, I ended up getting tickets only competition films (which are otherwise difficult to get) for the last day and made sure we could watch the good ones together (Kraftidioten and Nymphomaniac). That leaves the kind of films I want to see but I doubt anyone else would. “Praia do future” is one of these films because of Wagner Moura.

drrt

Praia do futuro
Brazil/Germany 2013, Karim Ainouz, 106’

Donato is a lifeguard at Future Beach when he fails to rescue a man for the first time. While he tries to cope with what happened, he meets and falls in love with the friend of the man, a tourist from Germany. When Konrad goes back to Berlin, Donato decides to follow him. After Konrad convinces Donato to stay, he realizes that he has a hard time adjusting to the cold city without a beach. Years later, when Donato’s brother comes to Berlin to find him, a lot of things have changed.
Death count: 1.

I will forever remember this movie as the one where you can see Wagner Moura’s penis, and I enjoyed the shots of Berlin in the film. Other than that, everything else was rather unsatisfying. I didn’t care much for the main characters’s story, I don’t really understand how and why Donato had the money to go to Germany but his brother had to save money for years to do the same thing. Sounds like Donato ran away with his family’s money. When I came out of the theater, I overheard a couple of women dissing the film – terrible dialogue, unrealistic etc. I didn’t think it was that bad. Au contraire, I thought the film had many sweet aspects and most of its moodiness made a lot of sense. I even thought that the end of the film, where the trio goes to the sea, was thoughtful and done very nicely. But in general, it’s your standard artsy gay film where nothing is explained (it cuts directly from the hospital scene “why don’t I give you a ride back?” to sex in the car) and everything happens incredibly slowly. In that respect, I think it’s a little sad for Wagner Moura to go from “Tropa de Elite” or even the small role in “Elysium” to a film like this.

Berlinale 2014, Day 9 (Ieji)

A new tradition is to watch at least one Tohoku Earthquake/Fukushima movie at the Berlinale. I wonder when this wave will ebb out (please excuse this incredibly horrible pun.)

drrt

Ieji (Homeland, ??)
Japan 2014, Nao Kubota, 118?

After several years in Tokyo, Jiro comes home and starts working the family farm again. It’s just that the village is completely empty because it’s in the Fukushima Exclusion Zone. Randomly, an old friend from school comes by fleeing the police and starts to live with him. Meanwhile his older half-brother Soichi with his wife, little daughter and mother-in-law live or rather vegetate in temporary housing outside the zone. The housing is so nondescript and anonymous that mother-in-law even loses her way in the rows of identical dwellings.  Initially they are not aware of Jiro’s return but someday they learn about it and Soichi wonders what happened, especially because Soichi’s stepmother, Jiro’s actual mother never got over his departure while she was still alive.

I have a shitton of respect for Sakura Ando. Besides her being a great actress she is not ashamed to look ugly, crazy or incredibly mediocre and boring, as in this movie.  The cinematography is your typical slow indie movie from Japan, so nothing to write home about (please excuse the punfest in this post!) however the pacing, relatively sparse dialogue and the general dynamic of the movie create a very interesting mood. The absolute carelessness and “slow suicide” (as his friend describes it) of Jiro feel weirdly compelling and nicely contrast the aimlessness and lack of hope in the temporary housing which feels highly suffocating. In the end it is a very nice and calm movie about how hard it is to completely lose your roots, to never be able to return to your home as it is just gone.

Berlinale 2014, Day 9 (Yukinojo Henge)

The Queen was out of order after the first movie on Saturday so I have the honour of presenting to you Saturday’s evening movies!

drrt

Yukinojo Henge (An Actor’s Revenge, ?????)
Japan 1935-36/1952, Teinosuke Kinugasa, 97?

Yukinojo’s parents were driven to suicide by the local magistrates when he was a child. It’s 1863 when he arrives with his troupe in Edo (now Tokyo) as a successful onnagata (woman actor in Kabuki theatre, they did the Shakespeare thing and did not allow women) finding his mortal enemies in the audience and finally exacting his carefully planned vengeance. After an opulent sword fight with one of his enemy’s henchmen and after burning down the house of another, finally all of them die in the Kabuki theatre in a quite literal dramatic catharsis.

An explanation about the production years is warranted: Originally produced as a 5-hour-long three-parter, the movie was premiered between June ’35 and January ’36. As it was Kinugasa’s most popular historical movie (jidaigeki) Shochiku smelled the money, slaughtered it down to 97 minutes and re released it in 1952. Unfortunately this is the only version in existence, so this is what was shown in Berlin.

I sorely lament the cut version. The movie is suspenseful, Kazuo Hasegawa as Yukinojo is a marvelous actor when he switches effeminate onnagata and vengeful onnagata, the lighting and cinematography overall is splendid. What remains of the plot is highly satisfying but feels highly rushed at all times. So much has been omitted that several times a voice from the off narrates what has been left out while they show a few shots from those cut scenes. However even cut down to 97 minutes it is a wonderful movie. While you lament how much better the original must have been, you still get caught up in the story and the portrayal of Yukinojo is highly captivating.

Berlinale 2014, Day 9 (Chiisai Ouchi)

I knew that blogging the Berlinale would become a chore one day. I was not able to blog a single film while the festival was still running, and I suspected it would take me the entire rest of the month of February at least to blog it. It also means that it’s been over two weeks since I saw the films I am blogging, and my memories and perceptions change. Oh well, it is an eternal blogging dilemma.

Today marks my earliest movie, 9am at the Friedrichstadtpalast. I was only able to secure a moderately good seat because I fell asleep in the subway and exited at Yorckstraße. Big mistake, there was a bus instead of the S-Bahn and I ended up running into the movie theater at 9.02am. Luckily they almost always start about 5 minutes after the scheduled time. I was perfectly fine and saw the entire film. After that stress, I ended up not seeing anything at all anymore, which is unfortunate because Pixelmatsch seems to have had fun.

drrt

Chiisai Ouchi (The Little House)
Japan 2014, Yoji Yamada, 136’

At the beginning of the 1930’s, Taki is a young woman from the northern parts of Japan who found employment as a maid. The Hirai family she works for consists of a nice couple with a little boy, who Taki becomes close to. They live in a cute little Western-style house with a bright red roof in the suburbs of Tokyo. While the husband is mostly interested in his business affairs and war politics, both the wife and young Taki fall in love with a co-worker of her husband’s, the young artist Itakura. Even as Mrs. Hirai begins to have an affair with the young man, Taki continues to stay loyal and care for the family. However, as the war drags, Itakura faces the risk of being drafted.
Death count: 3.

To be honest, when I heard that someone in Chiisai Ouchi got the award for best female actress, I honestly thought it would be Takako Matsu. I thought she was quite good in “Confessions” (though the film did not stand out for me, it was just solid all around), and Haru Kuroki is a complete youngster. She was lovely and very cute, but I am not sure how much acting is involved with that role. From what I can see, she essentially played herself. Even so, I really like her! Her somewhat plain face is so awesome, especially when compared to Takako Matsu’s astonishing beauty.

“Chiisai Ouchi” was a rather emotional film for me. With its psychological subtlety, the film hit my feelings perfectly except for the end. Just like other reviews suggested, I too thought the end was a little overly spelled out. I think it would have been nice to let it end with the shot where Taki says “I have lived for too long” and cries, and then cut to Takeshi finding the letter and saying something along the lines of “That little sin of yours, Aunt Taki, has been long forgiven.” That’s it. For me, that would have nailed the effect. Apart from that, Taki’s feelings were beautifully portrayed and of a bittersweet subtlety. But the not-really-love-triangle is not even the main draw of the film, it is those many historical details surrounding the film. Even though the film never really goes outside the little house which gave the film its title, the film shows with many details how much the war affects people’s lives even at the little house. We see children say “banzai” to each other in front of the house, characters running out of supplies and getting food from black markets, and finally the rumor that it is immoral to indulge in such things as love when there is a war effort going on. You can easily sense how the film focuses its sympathies with female characters who want absolutely nothing to do with the war, and in the end, the war effectively destroyed their lives even though they haven’t seen a single battlefield.

Similar with “Akibiyori”, I suppose I was also totally mesmerized with the style of the film. Even Taki always looks super clean and proper, and the little bit you see of her kimono underneath the housekeeper apron looks absolutely stylish. The film is a feast for the eyes, and it made me wish I could live in that little house and wear their clothes. I also was quite fond of the three time layers of story-telling – there is the time line where Taki is dead, the time line where old Taki is writing her memoir and discussing it with Takeshi and finally the time line of the happenings of the memoir. All three of them are actually necessary for the crucial ending, but even if you put that aside I liked it as a story-telling device.

One of my favorite scenes in the film is actually the one with Taki and her mother at the very beginning – it’s one in the film I remember which has humor in it. They speak a Northern dialect and talk about her dialect, and all the while the German subtitles are in Bavarian and the English subtitles say “y’all” and such. Many people laughed out loud. In situations like these, I am glad that movie theaters exist.

In the direct comparison with “Bai Ri Yan Huo”, I actually think that “Chiisai Ouchi” is the better film. It’s clever and has generally grander ambitions which it completely fulfills. If only it wasn’t for those extra 20 minutes with that dragged out ending, the film would have made an even bigger impact on me.

Berlinale 2014, Day 8 (Jujiro)

When Shii came to the Berlinale, he was especially interested in the Teinosuke Kinugasa films. Even though I am not particularly fond of samurai films, I thought I wanted to give it a try, and what better occasion is there than a day in which I can catch three films in a row in the same theater? The convenience was overwhelming.

drrt

Jujiro (Crossways)
Japan 1928, Teinosuke Kinugasa, 87’

Young Rikiya is into the beautiful prostitute O-Ume and gives her a kimono to woe her. But her followers beat him up and blind him. After Rikiya tries to stab someone, he thinks he murdered and runs back home to his sister. As she tries to help him, her landlord uses the situation to blackmail her into sleeping with him. Cornered, the sister kills the landlord, and both siblings must flee again.
Death count: 2, I assume.

Style-wise, I think that “Jujiro” is an expressionist masterpiece, and it really made me want to watch Kinugasa films again. There is something inherently beautiful in the depiction of despair in this film, and if the series is called “Aesthetics of Shadows”, then “Jujiro” is probably its best example. Kinugasa shows the poor, ragged and evil with mesmerizing beauty. Other than that, I typically have a hard time to love films which are really just despair and, in this case, essentially lacking anything human apart from the sister’s love (the brother himself did not seem to have done anything for his sister from what I can see, and generally seems to fail to understand what love is). To me, the story was nothing but a dragged out piece of pain, and my failure to feel for the characters here is similar to what I felt when I watched “Ninjo kamifusen” because I just couldn’t get behind what they did. I probably should have watched “Yukinojo Henge” instead – at least I can get behind that story for sure.

Berlinale 2014, Day 8 (The Typhoon)

Actually, “The Cheat” and “The Typhoon” were a double package, both featuring Sessue Hayakawa as main character. I thought it was remarkable that a sizable amount of people left after “The Cheat”, and after shortly speaking to some people passing us by, I realized that they did so completely on purpose. Those people probably have more important films to see at this important 7pm time slot, and perhaps they are right. As for me, Stephen Horne’s accompaniment was even more fun in “The Typhoon”.

drrt

The Typhoon
USA 1914, Reginald Barker, 63’

The Japanese spy Tokorama lives in Paris and uses his function as a diplomat to gather secret data on France. At the same time, he is dating a French actress who is a little too interested in his private life. When things go awry with her ex-boyfriend, she is being killed in Tokorama’s house. The Japanese delegation chooses a young student to confess to the murder so Tokorama can continue his work. But Tokorama cannot get over the deed he’s done.
Death count: 2.

There is a reason why so many left before “The Typhoon”. Ultimately the film is just as racist as “The Cheat”, and it’s hard to tell what is worse – are the Japanese a group of idiots with an overly heightened sense of sacrifice and patriotism, or are they dangerous psychopaths and rapists? There is one thing they both agree on: Japanese men are clearly into white women. Griffith-like racism aside, the more important reason not to watch the film is probably its terrible quality. Since Cecil B. DeMille absolutely deserves his spot in the list of great directors, it’s absolutely painful to see Reginald Barker’s work in direct comparison. The use of light and shadows is clumsy, the composition of shots is absolutely horrendous (I remember several examples of the main character being almost out of the frame for no good reason) and the storytelling is amateurish. There is nothing redeeming about this film really, absolutely nothing.

Berlinale 2014, Day 8 (The Cheat)

I was looking forward to the convenience of this day. After seeing one film starting 2pm, we would spend a whopping three more movies in the same movie theater. Yay! A nice person even went through the ranks to see our tickets so that we didn’t even have to get off our seats while we waited about half an hour for “Jujiro” to start, the last film of the day. (Much unlike the Friedrichstadtpalast who throws everybody out despite having a huge staff. Next to the Haus der Berliner Festspiele, I vow to avoid the Friedrichstadtpalast in the future as much as I can.) Finally, we’d be done for the day at around 9pm. It was the perfect schedule, but sadly not the perfect day.

drrt

The Cheat
USA 1915, Cecil B. DeMille, 59’

Edith Hardy, a bored, socialite housewife spends too much time with Tori, a rich Japanese dude with nothing to do, while spending all of her husband’s hard-earned money. At some point, she speculates with 10,000 dollars she collected from her group of friends for charity and loses the money. Tori offers to give the money to her, but only if she gives herself to him. Mrs. Hardy is horrified.
Death count: 1.

I knew about Cecil B. DeMille Award at the Golden Globes. It’s a fun thing, especially this year where it stirred a new controversy about Woody Allen’s family troubles. Apart from that, I have never felt very compelled to watch one of his films, fully knowing that he’s one of the major players who pioneered film-making. After seeing “The Cheat”, it is not only fascinating that he was one of the first, but that – just like George Méliès – he was so incredibly good at it. From the standpoint of an artist, “The Cheat” is absolutely beautiful. The scenes at Tori’s house are wonderfully moody and creepy, the film’s story is suspenseful and every single shot in the film seems to have the perfect length and looks perfectly right. It’s a very classic film, but it seems like for these beginnings, DeMille has figured it all out, effectively setting a standard of how films are shot for the time. Yes, there is a “good” way and a “bad” way to make films in the classical sense, and you can make errors in film-making just like you can in music composition (Mozart famously loved to point out his father’s mistakes at early age). Of course you can throw away all these rules at some point, but to do that the rules must exist. As for DeMille, I’d say his work is setting the rules and he’s a master at it.

Other than that, the storyline doesn’t really make sense. At first, Edith and Tori are shown as having this very friendly relationship where he is this extremely trusted family friend who essentially acts like a gay man around all these women. Then all of a sudden he requests sex for money and threatens her even though theoretically all he needed to do at that point was to give her the money and then charm her into sleeping with him. She would have done that in a heartbeat, no doubt about that. But no, they had to portray him as this brutal rapist who uses violence when he could have gotten what he wanted by asking nicely. Well, that’s the Western world in the 1910’s for you. I won’t really complain but to today’s eyes, it’s really disturbing to see. In the end I was torn between “Wow, this film is really well-made” and “The racism in this story is creeps me out”.

Berlinale 2014, Day 8 (Wa ga ya wa tanoshii)

It is ironic that this eighth day of the Berlinale coincides so well with my blogging fatigue. After this day, I totally did not feel like any more Berlinale days anymore. I had tickets for five more films (one on Saturday, four on Sunday), and I ended up watching those and not a single one more. Incidentally, I was very happy with my choices both for Saturday and Sunday, but overall I also thought enough was enough.

In that respect, Day 8 was probably the worst day of the Berlinale. While every other day had at least one title I was unabashedly fascinated with or at least loved very much, this day had one fine film and a few more films which I enjoyed rather little.

drrt

Wa ga ya wa tanoshii (Home Sweet Home)
Japan 1951, Noboru Nakamura, 91’

The Uemura family is held by a loving bond, with an earnest, hard-working father and a mother who is willing sacrifice her all to help her children achieve their dreams. The older daughter, Tomoko, studies painting and tries to have her works accepted at a gallery; the younger daughter, Nobuko, sings in a choir and is about to go on a school trip; finally there also are two younger children who are happily tumbling around. As the family is struggling with money even though the mother is working on the side, lucky and unlucky things happen to the family as time goes on. But the bond remains strong.
Death count: 0.

In reference to the introduction above, this film is the “fine” one. I really liked “Doshaburi” which resonated with me deeply, but I had doubts about the descriptions of the director’s other two films which are shown at the Berlinale. We thought that “Wa ga ya wa tanoshii” sounded like the better one of the two, promising to be at least a sweet story with the wonderful Chishu Ryu. Well, I’d say the film starts really well, with a loving family and many sweet scenes in which everybody gathers, but then it digs rather deeply into the sappy relationship between the mother and Tomoko and that, coupled with a convenient deus ex machina ending, made me feel a little cheated out of a perfectly cute film.

I really think that what I like the most about Noboru Nakamura’s films is the way he depicts families which love each other (at least in “Doshaburi” and “Wa ga ya wa tanoshii”). The opposite of that is the very reason I dislike Hirokazu Koreeda, where I thought that both “Nobody knows” and “Still Walking” are both based on neglect and hatred. Maybe “Soshite chichi ni naru” is better than that (and honestly I am very curious about the film). Coming back to Nakamura, his depictions may seem a little too idealized and melodramatic, but to me they absolutely feel realistic. As long as it touched me, I believe there is some positive connection between what Nakamura shows and what I feel about family relationships. I have just dismissed the deus ex machina ending in the story but the truth is that I found it emotionally satisfying, completing the little fairy tale Nakamura crafted.