Berlinale 2017, Day 4 (Call me by your name)

Like most people I know who go to the Berlinale, I avoid the gay movies. Of course I make conscious exceptions like I did for “Love is Strange” (largely because I am into Alfred Molina and John Lithgow and liked the premise a lot), but when it comes to the Berlinale the genre is famously oversaturated so the likelihood of stumbling upon something great (like “Weekend”, in my mind perhaps the greatest gay film ever) is so small that I usually wouldn’t run the risk.

In this case, I completely failed to realize that this is a gay movie. (Can you believe it?) I thought “oh there is a new movie by the director of ‘I am love’ and I have not seen an Italian film in awhile”, and that was enough for me to choose this film without looking at the synopsis too closely.

It was also the first time I saw a late screening at this year’s Berlinale, and the first thing I noticed about the film was that it managed to keep me awake even though I felt really, really tired. Even though I was at the premiere of the film, I couldn’t be bothered to stay for the Q&A afterwards.

drrt

Call me by your name
Italy/France 2017, Luca Guadagnino, 132′

Every year, Elio’s family takes in a young archaeological researcher at their summer villa to stay with them and to help Elio’s father with his research. This year, the visitor is a charming and exceeding good-looking American who first confuses Elio, but slowly they realize their feelings for each other.

It’s difficult not to compare the film with “I am love”, so I will unashamedly do so. What struck me the most was how incredibly unusual “I am love” is as a film, and how straight-forward the love story plot in “Call me by your name” is compared to it. How can a director who cooks up some of the most unusual stories make another movie about something so trivial? Not that it is necessarily a bad thing – boy meets girl (in this case boy meets boy) can be nice and interesting – but I just expected otherwise from this director. I was especially into the family relationships in “I am love”, which I felt was sorely missing here. All the other characters just served as supporting cast to the main characters’s relationship. Literally supporting in fact.

That was another thing that surprised me a little – the relationship has absolutely no challenges outside of itself. That can be nice too, but in this case the parents and girlfriends (!) seemed over the top helpful. The parents freely discuss their son’s relationship: “Oh our 17 year old son’s boyfriend is leaving and he will be heart-broken so why don’t we send them on a short city trip so they can intensify their feelings further before he leaves?” The girlfriend Elio toys with and essentially dumps by not talking to her for 3 days says stuff like “I don’t want to get involved with you. I have a sense that you will hurt me and I don’t want to be hurt” prior to entering a relationship with him anyways (of course), but after getting dumped and after Oliver leaves, she (almost literally) says this to Elio: “I heard about Oliver leaving, and I’m sorry that you are sad. It’s alright, I am not angry at you, I really am not. Can we still be friends? I love you, Elio.” What the heck?

If one accepts that “Call me by your name” is the ultimate gay high society utopia, the film can be thoroughly entertaining (as I hinted before, I did not fall asleep during it) precisely because everything was so utopic and idyllic. Just like “Love is strange” (and also like “I am love”) the characters live in this perfect world of thoughtful intellectuals in which they have a scrumptious breakfast in their Italian garden, with fresh orange (or other) juice, croissants and fruits from their orchard. When the father and Oliver talk about their archaelogical research (and claim that those ancient sculptures of males were erotic), the mother comes in with more freshly squeezed juice in a jug and pretty cups on a tablet. Their cook makes the most delicious looking foods, and they all casually switch between their three languages within any conversation (French, Italian, English). Oh and they are Jews too!

I was amused to see that Louis Garrel’s sister is somehow just completely normal-looking, much like Chiara Mastroianni. The girls in the film are all comparably average-looking, whereas the main characters look more like of a combination of Shii and Louis Garrel himself (Elio), and Don Draper in blonde (Oliver). Alfred Molina and John Lithgow make for a more realistic couple in “Love is strange”, but as I said, you just have to accept the utopia “Call me by your name” lives in, and then the film becomes a fun escapist fantasy. (OK, the sex scenes were boring. At some point 2/3 into the film, the physical aspect of their relationship became important and I yawned throughout it pretty heavily.)

Oh, I also like the gimmick with the title (which I completely failed to realize until it was shown at the end of the film). It’s cute, and it reminded me of “You’re ugly too”.

Berlinale 2012, day 3 (Everyone must die in India)

This year we have a new venue: the “Haus der Berliner Festspiele”, a theatre built in the 60s, so obviously it is very bright, open and rectangular! Very fitting for today’s second screening as you will see. For the third we also had something new: the IMAX 3D above the Cinestar moved out and now we have a huge screen with big comfy leather chairs with lots of legroom and space for all other extremities you may have.

drrt

My Way
South Korea 2011, Kang Je-Gyu, 137?

Shortly after D-Day, a picture of a Korean man in a German uniform is found; it turned out that he served in the Japanese, Soviet and German army. This serves as inspiration for the story of rival marathon runners Jun-shik and Tatsuo who miraculously make it through the war starting as Japanese soldiers in Manchuria, going through Siberia as POWs and later Soviet soldiers, just to end up as German soldiers on D-Day at the French coast.

So this is what happens when you try to outdo Hollywood: At least two truckloads of pathos and a big helping of noble idiocy together with more than one occurence of deus ex machina which was only needed to save the hero from dramatically unnecessary plot points which just served the purpose of building suspense and tension that had no real point in advancing the story. The whole experience somehow redeems itself through managing to avoid any situation that could be possibly construed as supportive of war in general. Another strong point would be that apart from our main noble idiot the main characters are portrayed as rather human and believable (Fan Bingbing was gorgeous by the way.), something you do not usually expect from an action-driven blockbuster attempt. Unfortunately this does not extend to most Japanese shown on screen, not that the lot of them was particularly likeable in reality, but dark gray is not black. As a craftsman the director goes all-out, every second oozes the smell of big budget. Ignoring the overly imposing American-style soundtrack, the cinematography, costumes and effects are an absolute feast, if not a little gory. The research for the Normandy unfortunately slacked a little (A German-Turkish soldier without a hint of accent in his German? Oh, please. I was waiting for him to talk about his small business selling spinning meat, back in Berlin.) however most of it would be invisible to anyone not too familiar with Germany, it is not one of the major flaws.

drrt

Cesare deve morire (Caesar must die)
Italy 2011, Paolo & Vittorio Taviani, 76?

The directors observe over the span of six months the rehearsals of a theatre project in the Roman high security prison Rebibbia for their production of Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”.

What sounded like a documentary about a theatre play actually turned out to be 90% theatre play disguising itself as a documentary.  Apart from the introduction there is hardly a scene where anyone speaks out of character. Only sometimes one of the inmates stops and thinks when one of the more universal lines hits somewhere close to his life as mafia or drug dealer. Other than that they constantly rehearse all over the prison grounds, captivating the other inmates and sometimes even the guards. The seemingly random choice of places for their rehearsals poses the question how much of this was staged, as the string of rehearsals actually makes a great production of the play in itself. Aiding in the suspense of disbelief is the subtle background music and the high-contrast B/W picture, all of this however would not help if the prisoners would not have had a surprisingly firm grasp on their characters.

drrt

From Seoul to Varanasi (????)
South Korea 2011, Jeon Kyu-Hwan, 98?

Youngwoo and Jiyoung have been married for ten years and lead a typical stale marriage. Youngwoo is a publisher and is having an affair with one of his writers. Jiyoung, bored out of her mind, becomes fascinated with the gentle young muslim Kerim. One day he has to leave Korea and she follows him to Varanasi, searching for him through the whole town. Youngwoo trusts the note she left about visiting her family and goes about his daily life until he sees his wife on TV in the aftermath of a restaurant bombing in India.

Naked people do many naked things. Nah, I’m kidding, there is more than that. However it is made very sure that Youngwoo’s very healthy sex drive is depicted in all its accuracy, quite daring for a Korean film as the government recently tries to restrict artistic expression again, in an act of desperation (or at least that’s what a group of young Koreans thought about it). Interestingly, the droning meditative music and sometimes fumbling focus together with his Buddha-like features somehow make this look like an overly carnal spiritual exercise. The story is a sometimes confusing series of scenes, not arranged in order, sometimes jumping from one end of the story to another. It definitely demands concentration to follow, I never found it to be too much however.

Interesting detail about the main actor: He wanted to play in one of the director’s earlier films but had a problem with doing a masturbation scene, so ultimately rejected the role. He said that after this film where he even had to show his penis “to the world” (yes, he said that) he realises that he was kind of childish back then.