There can only be one true Hitchcock

drrt

Double Take

Since Pixelmatsch is watching Berlinale films now, I figured I should finally get myself “working” and write about these old Berlinale films we never saw.

“Double Take” is the kind of film that is so experimental that it cannot be put into words. I’d say it’s a collage of film snippets and comments on the cold war, paralleling a story of Hitchcock meeting his own double from 20 years later. The whole thing is a little reminiscent of film installations but without being annoying. So random! It’s fascinating to say the least.

Apart from that, I must admit that it took me a long time to get the movie, in fact I am fairly convinced that I never got the film. It’s like a problem whose solution is not quite obvious and I consider the possibility that one must be very good at reading between the lines to see the connections between the changing scenes in the film. I am not. What I did see is a visual feast of a film and a somewhat avant-garde treatise on the doppelganger topic, so incredibly fitting for Hitchcock. I did find it a little unfortunate that the film was mostly focused on “The Birds” (and its release date), which happens to be my least favorite Hitchcock film.

Hitchcock was the first movie director I have ever known, even before David Fincher or Steven Spielberg. I have seen all types of films by him – more than one even: 2 silent films, 2 black-and-white films and the rest were color. For me, Hitchcock is the movie director to end all movie directors, and with my two favorites of his, “Rear Window” and “The Trouble with Harry”, I think Hitchcock is the kind of guy who is precisely not cerebral, but provides entertainment infused with wit (“Rear Window”), comedy (“The Trouble with Harry”) and suspense (everything else). I might not have liked every Hitchcock film I have seen, but I love the unparalleled diversity he displays. I adore him to pieces, in a similar way as I adore my advisor who I regularly disagree with. With that in mind, I think that “Double Take” is playing too much the cliché-Hitchcock card, but that is alright because the film is a good homage to the master.

Without any background, “Double Take” is probably completely unwatchable, but for me, it hit the right spot by being incomprehensibly stylish instead of pretentiously avant-garde. Just don’t ask me what I watched there. If you are interested in such films, watch it and try to see it in a theater. You’ll come out completely confused, and it’ll feel good.

Berlinale 2012, day 5 (*nya~*)

So apparently Cambodian films from the 70s are popular. Which means I do not get to see them. After today’s first film however, that was kind of bearable!

drrt

Rent-a-Neko (Rent-a-Cat, ?????)
Japan 2012, Ogigami Naoko, 110′

Sayoko, a girl nearing her 30s in (not very active) search for marriage lives in her dead grandmother’s house together with lots of cats, as these are the only living creatures attracted to her. Every day she goes out with her cart advertising her rent-a-cat service.

Four years the same director presented “Megane”, which I also watched. Apparently she is in the businees of making “healing” films, an absolutely wonderful sub-classification of various cultural products aimed at making you feel all warm, fuzzy and at ease. The cats are delightful, the music is healing, the visuals are healing, Sayoko is healing… Most of the movie is very episodic, with Sayoko going out to lend a cat and focusing on one specific customer and his problems. Only near the end, when she meets the boy from her past it looks like things might be heading somewhere. The episodes are separated from each other through several somehow surreal sequences showing her more profitable sources of income, which remind us, that this movie really is not meant to be a serious realistic story but just a lovely something to make you feel good.

Berlinale 2012, day 4 (Marching)

Oh boy, I think half of ex-Yugoslavia came to watch Parada. Half the theatre laughed at distinctly different timings: One half to the subtitles, the other to the spoken dialogue. I’ll brag a little and say that I fell into the latter category a few times.

drrt

Parada
Serbia, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia 2011, Srdjan Dragojevic, 115′

A Serbian small-time gangster and war veteran wants to marry his girlfriend and somehow ends up needing to protect his gay wedding planner who wants to organise a gay pride parade in Belgrad even though groups of nationalists and skinheads have promised to destroy any attempt at doing so. He rounds up an impossible troupe of Croatians, Muslim Bosnians and Kosovarians and in the process learns a lot about life.

Seldom have you seen a movie that rides so much on every possible stereotype for joke material, be it homosexuals, nationalist skinheads, trashy girlfriends or any of the Yugoslavian people. It is very easy for such a film to turn positively revolting with banality. “Parada” however absolutely avoids this, because none of those groups is spared and while everyone dishes out on each other, they also take all “abuse” with a big heap of self-irony as they get to know each other. It was full of lovely little details, such as one scene where the Serb and the Croat make a cross: Catholics (Slovenians and Croats) first touch the left shoulder, while Orthodox (Serbs) will touch the right shoulder first. It showed quite realistically that people bond over the most banal things and that this is really all it takes sometimes. Our gangster’s evolution was just lovely, he starts out like a typical macho gangster but almost from the first minute it is absolutely clear that he really is a good person at heart and just needs a good thorough reality check. All of it beautifully transported the endearingly naive hope that somehow everything will work out if we just stop hating each other and start to listen.

drrt

Highway
Nepal, USA 2011, Deepak Rauniyar. 80′

A man and his wife have trouble conceiving. He travels into the mountains to talk with a healer. He receives a potion but it will only work for 36 hours so now he has to return as quickly as possible to Kathmandu. The bus he travels on is full of people who also need to be somewhere for various reasons, but progress is slow with road blockades, accidents, traffic jams and an ageing bus.

A very solid first work. The shots and colours make for great visuals, helped by the either exotic or plain beautiful sights of Nepal. The music is mostly fitting; not every piece feels right, sometimes it is a little off but it does never really hurts the atmosphere. Throughout the journey we learn about the passengers; who they are, what makes them take up the arduous journey to Kathmandu. The stories and their placement manage to tell just about enough to be interesting but are always short enough not to take away the feeling of a road movie. For anyone who has at least a little curiosity it is a quite rewarding look into a few typical issues of life in modern Nepal

The Berlinale makes me homesick

drrt

Chroniken der Anna Magdalena Bach

Instead of looking for movies to see, all I can do is look for which talks I want to go to at my next conference – how sad. As much as I love movie theater experiences, I do not mind seeing films at home. There are a bunch of movies in my life which have managed to touch me despite having seen them on TV or just on a small monitor.

“Chroniken der Anna Magdalena Bach” is definitely a small monitor movie, although a good sound system definitely helps. It’s a lot like watching a symphony performance on a screen. I was quite amazed. It might look like a dry and “boring” movie, but compared with a symphony orchestra performance, it’s as exciting as “The Dark Knight”. I might be the only person in this world who likes this movie, but I certainly did. It made me get extremely interested in Bach again! I read up on his sons, who – unsurprisingly – also played a fairly important role in the Bach couple’s life.

Let this be a warning. The film is nothing like an actual biopic, and quite different from most movies. It looks very austere, stern and clean, and the voice-over in which Anna Magdalena Bach narrates her life sounds odd, because the language used is old, and the voice is impressively monotone. What keeps me up from falling asleep indeed was the music. I know almost nothing about Bach’s life and never really liked to play him. Bach’s pieces look easy and boring, yet they were awfully hard to play precisely because of that. It is not emotions in the romantic style which could tell you how to play something, and I thought it was hard to get into the “mood” to play Bach. Why does everybody I know like Bach so much? This film gives me some sort of an answer – after listening to Bach’s music for roughly 1 1/2 hours, I come to the conclusion that there is something strangely beautiful about it. It makes me happy and a little solemn to listen to it, and I think this little film is a great tribute to Bach.

I remember that Gorp, who loves Straub-Huillet, did not recommend this film to me. But it’s on Netflix and I was extremely curious, so I couldn’t resist. And now I am surprised at how much I liked it! (You probably won’t, but that’s fine.) I must go and do research on Bach now.

Berlinale 2012, day 3 (Everyone must die in India)

This year we have a new venue: the “Haus der Berliner Festspiele”, a theatre built in the 60s, so obviously it is very bright, open and rectangular! Very fitting for today’s second screening as you will see. For the third we also had something new: the IMAX 3D above the Cinestar moved out and now we have a huge screen with big comfy leather chairs with lots of legroom and space for all other extremities you may have.

drrt

My Way
South Korea 2011, Kang Je-Gyu, 137?

Shortly after D-Day, a picture of a Korean man in a German uniform is found; it turned out that he served in the Japanese, Soviet and German army. This serves as inspiration for the story of rival marathon runners Jun-shik and Tatsuo who miraculously make it through the war starting as Japanese soldiers in Manchuria, going through Siberia as POWs and later Soviet soldiers, just to end up as German soldiers on D-Day at the French coast.

So this is what happens when you try to outdo Hollywood: At least two truckloads of pathos and a big helping of noble idiocy together with more than one occurence of deus ex machina which was only needed to save the hero from dramatically unnecessary plot points which just served the purpose of building suspense and tension that had no real point in advancing the story. The whole experience somehow redeems itself through managing to avoid any situation that could be possibly construed as supportive of war in general. Another strong point would be that apart from our main noble idiot the main characters are portrayed as rather human and believable (Fan Bingbing was gorgeous by the way.), something you do not usually expect from an action-driven blockbuster attempt. Unfortunately this does not extend to most Japanese shown on screen, not that the lot of them was particularly likeable in reality, but dark gray is not black. As a craftsman the director goes all-out, every second oozes the smell of big budget. Ignoring the overly imposing American-style soundtrack, the cinematography, costumes and effects are an absolute feast, if not a little gory. The research for the Normandy unfortunately slacked a little (A German-Turkish soldier without a hint of accent in his German? Oh, please. I was waiting for him to talk about his small business selling spinning meat, back in Berlin.) however most of it would be invisible to anyone not too familiar with Germany, it is not one of the major flaws.

drrt

Cesare deve morire (Caesar must die)
Italy 2011, Paolo & Vittorio Taviani, 76?

The directors observe over the span of six months the rehearsals of a theatre project in the Roman high security prison Rebibbia for their production of Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”.

What sounded like a documentary about a theatre play actually turned out to be 90% theatre play disguising itself as a documentary.  Apart from the introduction there is hardly a scene where anyone speaks out of character. Only sometimes one of the inmates stops and thinks when one of the more universal lines hits somewhere close to his life as mafia or drug dealer. Other than that they constantly rehearse all over the prison grounds, captivating the other inmates and sometimes even the guards. The seemingly random choice of places for their rehearsals poses the question how much of this was staged, as the string of rehearsals actually makes a great production of the play in itself. Aiding in the suspense of disbelief is the subtle background music and the high-contrast B/W picture, all of this however would not help if the prisoners would not have had a surprisingly firm grasp on their characters.

drrt

From Seoul to Varanasi (????)
South Korea 2011, Jeon Kyu-Hwan, 98?

Youngwoo and Jiyoung have been married for ten years and lead a typical stale marriage. Youngwoo is a publisher and is having an affair with one of his writers. Jiyoung, bored out of her mind, becomes fascinated with the gentle young muslim Kerim. One day he has to leave Korea and she follows him to Varanasi, searching for him through the whole town. Youngwoo trusts the note she left about visiting her family and goes about his daily life until he sees his wife on TV in the aftermath of a restaurant bombing in India.

Naked people do many naked things. Nah, I’m kidding, there is more than that. However it is made very sure that Youngwoo’s very healthy sex drive is depicted in all its accuracy, quite daring for a Korean film as the government recently tries to restrict artistic expression again, in an act of desperation (or at least that’s what a group of young Koreans thought about it). Interestingly, the droning meditative music and sometimes fumbling focus together with his Buddha-like features somehow make this look like an overly carnal spiritual exercise. The story is a sometimes confusing series of scenes, not arranged in order, sometimes jumping from one end of the story to another. It definitely demands concentration to follow, I never found it to be too much however.

Interesting detail about the main actor: He wanted to play in one of the director’s earlier films but had a problem with doing a masturbation scene, so ultimately rejected the role. He said that after this film where he even had to show his penis “to the world” (yes, he said that) he realises that he was kind of childish back then.

Berlinale 2012, day 2 (Sakura Andou is God)

I usually like the CineStar for showing original language films, for the Berlinale I usually hate it for their ass-backwardness in selling tickets. Unlike all others you can not buy tickets for the evening during the day. Well guess what happened when I came from the other movie to buy tickets…

drrt

Kazoku no Kuni (Our Homeland, ??????)
Japan 2012, Yang Yong-Hi, 100?

Song-Ho left Japan 25 years ago to live in North Korea, his parents and his little sister Rie stayed. Now, he comes back to receive medical treatment unavailable in the Worker’s Paradise on Earth. While he is stuck in his hopeless existence due to his family left in Korea, Rie does not accept her fate and tries to stay out of the influence of her so-called homeland.

Being the director’s first fictional work after doing several documentaries (which have also been shown at the Berlinale) it unsurprisingly has a very realistic style. Music can be found in the end, other than that the ambient noise of summer in Japan serves as a background. Of course we have our dreaded handheld cam which fortunately is quite stable most of the time and not at all hectic. It does not frame the scenery, rather following and observing the characters, which are the strong point of the movie. All performances were surprisingly good, both in awkwardness as in emotional explosions, however Sakura Andou is God! I probably haven’t said this clearly enough yet. She is the perfect actress for those slightly rebellious, slightly detached but nonetheless very emotional characters she portrays. It is almost a miracle how she manages to ooze attractiveness even though she just is not good-looking. The film definitely succeeds in portraying the helplessness and resignation of the whole family in dealing with the overbearing, often completely unreasonable “care” of their so-called homeland.

Unsurprisingly, Rie is an autobiographical figure. The director’s three brothers were also sent to North Korea and one of them actually really came back for treatment. Song-Ho’s character is an amalgamation of all three.

Berlinale 2012, day 1 (the mayor without a town)

It is again that time of the year where I fumble for words sitting half-awake, trying to remember what the movie was about and trying to convey what the staff actually said during Q&A, enjoy!

drrt

Nuclear Nation
Japan 2012, Funahashi Atsushi, 145′

After being swallowed by the tsunami and receiving a hefty dose of radiation from the neighbouring Fukushima Daiichi the 1400 residents of Futaba evacuate to an abandoned school in the suburbs of  Tokyo. The mayor now without a town desperately attempts to keep the community together, spread optimism, and to understand what happened. Once an enthusiastic advocate of atomic energy, he is now forced to experience how the victims are fobbed off with banalities, insubstantial apologies and directionless policies. Days pass with little concerts, wrestling matches and other little events to distract from the absurd reality such as a painfully rushed visit of two hours into the exclusion zone, arranged for the residents to salvage and mourn.

Unlike Yanaka Boshoku this was completely no-frills: pure documentary, no narrator, almost no music. The narrative was subtly evoked through the choice of residents speaking out throughout the film. While at first it just portrayed the grief and sense of loss it slowly shifted to show the humiliation and resignation people had to endure, although a good part was able to move out of the school into temporary or even permanent housing, moving on with their lives. Something about the first part was very touching; even though he just let the residents speak showing them as regular country folk, not idealised people, their incredible sense of loss was absolutely gripping, no one even cried on screen, they just calmly talked about what they lost be it relatives, friends or possessions. The music was very minimal, consisting of a few wind instruments and a piano only serving as a gentle background to the scenery shots of a devastated coast.  Amazingly, the ending theme “for Futaba” was composed and played by none other than Ryuichi Sakamoto!

After quite a long round of applause the director thanked the audience very sincerely as this was the world premiere and he finished cutting only six days earlier and actually literally brought the finished copy inside his backpack, fuelling a lot of anxiety with the Berlinale staff. The mayor actually wanted to come to Berlin together with the director, but he was forced to stay behind to attend talks with the government to oppose a radioactive waste dump in Futaba. Instead we watched a video message, recorded jsut four days earlier where he greeted the audience in German (so cute!) and held a short speech about his complete and utter turnaround on nuclear energy. The notion to make a film about the residents of Futaba actually came about in two ways: Funahashi had scheduled to shoot a film (a love story, heh) in early April, however this was a classic example of wrong time and wrong place as not only the earthquake happened when it did but the filming location was supposed to be the coast of Touhoku. Having no job he thought about what he could do and came to the realisation that his life-long wish to somehow put into pictures his Hiroshima heritage (he is 2nd generation) finally had the ideal opportunity. Chance also had it, that the abandoned high school where Futaba-in-exile moved in was not far from his own home and things just went from there.

They never marry!

drrt

If you are the one 2

I was positively impressed by the first film, even though I don’t even remember why that is. Researching the films a little bit, it turns out that the movies made it into theaters outside of China. Nevertheless, I believe that the (limited) US release was probably exclusively watched by Chinese people – who else would watch this crap? Chinese product placement, Chinese humor and especially the dreadful Chinese focus on money and utterly tasteless display of luxury, I have no reason why anybody else would want to bear with this.

Personally I watched the film because I love Ge You and Shu Qi, and even think that they make up an amusing couple. Even in this film, I thought that their relationship is pleasantly comical and just looking at them together made the worthwhile for me. Of course that also meant that I literally skipped over the subplot with the friend which was utterly pointless. Even the moment of realization in “Viaggio in Italia” made more sense to me than this movie. Why must people in movies always come to ultimately love each other for no apparent reason? In “Viaggio in Italia” it’s because they got lost, in “Walk the Line” it’s because they are standing on stage, in this film it’s because somebody else dies. After all, people die every day?

Another appeal of the film was the fact that this is ultimately a slightly sarcastic comedy on love. For a rom-com, people actually talk a lot about what they think love is or should be, and to some degree, that was interesting. It is probably hard to find love these days, or at least Chinese society perceives it so, and taking it with a grain of salt is probably the best thing they can do.

The subtitles to the film are pretty horrible, by the way. Another reason why you shouldn’t watch it unless you speak the language, apart from the fact that this sequel is much, much worse than the original.

I watched this because it’s going to get taken down from Netflix

drrt

Metropolitan

Sometimes I feel like watching random films I know nothing about, and more often than not, I am in for a pleasant surprise. All I know about “Metropolitan” is that it has a nice-looking Criterion cover, which turns out to have nothing to do with the style of the film itself. In fact, even though cover and storyline suggest some upper-class milieu, the film itself is made on the cheap. Add in some Hana-yori-dango-like 80’s fashion and you have your perfect strangely cheap and dated looking rich people movie. Luckily, “Metropolitan” is more than a showcase of costumes, which is perhaps the only reason why I watched the film in its entirety.

First of all – Oh gosh, I loved Nick. While the film itself doesn’t leave that much space for actual comedy, some of the things Nick says are pure comedic gold. This film absolutely needed a cynical character, and Nick delivers perfectly. I love how he ended up getting himself punched in the face, and I was sad that he left the show. Sure, Tom is supposed to be the main character, but the film almost lost its appeal after they sent Nick to the train station.

I can’t quite make up my mind about whether I think the actors were good or not. Sometimes I felt like their way of talking was strange, but then I realized… oh my God, they talk like Woody Allen! It’s a New York movie, so it almost makes sense. They go on and on about themselves and odd topics nobody really wants to hear nor would understand, yet at the same time, it is amusing to listen to. Critics mention how the dialogue is written in a way that people do not really speak, citing that they use “nevertheless” or “however”. I was like… really? I use “nevertheless” in my speech, or rather at least in German I do. How else do you want to have a discussion if you don’t connect your thoughts? Personally I liked their silly discussions so much, for all I care the film could just as well have been an episode of these kids hanging around and talk.

But of course the film has to evolve into some love quadrangle, actually it has more than that – Charlie likes Audrey who likes Tom who likes Serena who broke up with Rick who sleeps Cynthia who slept with Nick who probably offended Jane with that. The last part is speculation, so if Jane had a crush on Nick, then Fred and Sally are the only characters not involved in this whole love ordeal. I thought the film was worth to see, and I am now curious about “The last days of disco”, another one of these ironic commentary films. I have a thing for the “doomed bourgeois in love” theme – it’s a guilty pleasure if you want – and I think that Whit Stillmann managed to adapt it well from 19th century European novels into 80-90s movies. Definitely a nice, multidimensional film.

If I was queen, I’d abolish myself too

drrt

The Young Victoria

I had this strange desire to watch “Jane Eyre”, but then I ended up with “The Young Victoria” instead, figuring that they’d be somewhat similar. Historic costumes, a fairly Biedermeier-like atmosphere of love – that was what I was looking for. My parents saw this film and really liked it, so I had to give it a try too.

From what I see, the screenshots of “Jane Eyre” are actually prettier. In Victoria’s younger days, clothes were more… frilly, I suppose? Some of Victoria’s costumes make me wonder if it was one of my roommates from my first semester at Tech who color-coordinated them – sooo bad, really. In comparison to that, I prefer the fleeting simplicity of “Jane Eyre”. But sadly I really dislike Mia Wasikowska (at least in “Alice in Wonderland” I did), whereas I think Emily Blunt is rather pleasant, and very suitable for the Victoria role.

This is one of those films which makes you want to find out all about its history – in fact, it is much more about politics rather than the love story, where nothing really happens. There is not even a love rival! I am not quite sure how I feel about Victoria myself. I admire her for having been able to stay queen for 64 years, and for fostering reforms beneficial to her country. But on the other hand, I wonder how much she actually contributed to it herself, having spent a good part of her life mourning the death of her husband, precisely when the Industrial Revolution was at its peak. (Also, in just 4 years, Elizabeth II will actually overtake her in length of, ahem. She will have to survive to the age of 89, and it sounds feasible.) But I digress. I have a certain admiration for England at her time, perhaps the only time when England was truly shining, and while bourgeoisie is so criticized in Germany, it feels much more positive there. Oddly enough, bourgeois morals should have been even more restricting in the UK but garnered in Victorian dresses and bonnets, you get this superficial impression that society seemed very happy at the time.

All in all, “The Young Victoria” is not a particularly relevant film. It is slow-paced, rather interesting and romantic in its strangely british cold kind of way, fulfilling its cliché. I liked it, but I don’t think anybody else would.